Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Blog Post #6: Reframing Inquiry


I have always taught in an Engineering & Technology classroom mostly at the high school level. I think Engineering classrooms are excellent examples of Inquiry Learning in practice. To me, Inquiry Learning is teachers and students engaged in project-based learning, utilizing problem-solving strategies and real-world questioning to synthesize and communicate information. It allows students to test hypotheses in a challenging environment without the risk of failure.

The first thing that really hits home with me about Inquiry Learning is that it should be engaging for both students and teachers. In older models of teaching the emphasis on engagement is a student focus. But in our Implementing Inquiry reading it is discussed that "teacher interest and curiosity about a topic will increase the teacher's investment and provide a model of engagement for students." How can we expect our students to get interested in a topic when we are providing all sorts of clues to them that we are not interested in it ourselves? By doing this, we have possibly lost their interest in a subject before we have even begun our lesson. It reminds me of coming through my undergraduate work and always being reminded by my professors that, "your students are always watching you." In most cases, this was in reference to how you handled yourself in a situation or how you treated other people. We were reminded to always be a good example of those things because our students would be watching and possibly taking their queue's from us. I think it's time we add "interest in subject matter" to this conversation as well.

In the article "What the Heck is Inquiry-Based Learning?" author Heather Wolpert-Gawron says, "Inquiry-based learning is more than asking a student what he or she wants to know. It’s about triggering curiosity. And activating a student’s curiosity is, I would argue, a far more important and complex goal than the objective of mere information delivery." To me, this perfectly sums up what we are trying to accomplish through Inquiry Learning. The focus should no longer be on how we disseminate information. The focus should be on how we use our resources to trigger to curiosity and interest. By generating genuine curiosity and interest in the subject matter, genuine learning can occur.

Thinking of an Engineering classroom, I also really appreciate Tina Barseghian's article "Creating Classrooms We Need: 8 Ways Into Inquiry Learning". In her article she discusses "Embracing Failure" and the difference between "blameworthy" and "praiseworthy" failure. If we are encouraging our students to step out on the ledge of these new learning practices with us, we need to make sure they understand that they won't always be successful on their first attempt. And if that happens, that isn't a failure, that's an opportunity to gain knowledge and experience at a deeper level. This point related to Inquiry Learning I think is vital to the whole process.


Mini Lessons

Certification Area: Technology Education
Standards: Georgia Department of Education: STEM Cluster
Focus Standard: STEM-FET-1

Lesson 1: Ethical Use of Information
Students will research a given Engineering problem. Once students have time to formulate their answers they will be asked to look through a curated list of resources regarding the ethical use of information. Students will be asked to review their answers to see if they have been done correctly. Students will be asked to rewrite answers to credit all information and ideas to their respective owners. Students will learn about researching real-world examples and giving credit to owners of the original work. Students will use technology to research answers to real-world Engineering design scenarios. Students will share their experience with a partner and discuss with each other their findings both on their research answers but also how to cite information. 

Lesson 2: Resume Writing
Students will study the importance of resume writing and understand its importance in job search process. Students will use a variety of technology resources to learn about how to write a well-formatted resume. Students will have the ability to research an actual job opening posting in an area of interest to them to focus their assignment work on. Students will produce a finished resume for their job posting, one that they could follow for future use. Students will be assessed on their final resume.

Lesson 3: Interviewing
Students will study the importance of Interviewing and understand its importance in the job search process. Students will use a variety of technology resources to learn about how to properly prepare for an interview, what to expect in an interview, and how to conduct themselves in an interview. Students will be paired with partners and will take turns participating in mock-interviews. Students will be assessed on a final mock interview with the teacher. 

My technology resources for these lessons will allow for extension because they will be resources that are real-world tools used for career planning and job searching. It will expose students to resources they can use outside the classroom and in future use as they prepare to write resumes and go on job interviews in real life. Career planning is a field that also requires keeping up with current trends and understanding what is being looked for. There are a lot of misunderstood pieces about the job searching process. These lessons and my use of technology will be something that students can use regardless of career field and can be a skill they use in life many, many years down the road. 




Barseghian, T. (2013, March 11). Creating Classrooms We Need: 8 Ways Into Inquiry Learning. Retrieved June 7, 2017, from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2013/03/11/creating-classrooms-we-need-8-ways-into-inquiry-learning/

Implementing Inquiry M5 Resource

Wolpert-Gawron, H. (2016, August 11). What the Heck Is Inquiry-Based Learning? Retrieved June 7, 2017, from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/what-heck-inquiry-based-learning-heather-wolpert-gawron 

  

Friday, June 2, 2017

Blog Post #5

I am very happy with my progress towards the learning goals I identified for this course. We have already covered topics related to 3 of my 4 goals (developing a personal definition of information fluency and inquiry learning, growing my skills in information searching, evaluation, and ethical use of information, and expanding my competency in the use of blogs and Twitter). I know we will cover my last goal (devising a plan for incorporating inquiry learning in my classroom) before the end of this semester. To this point, I feel like the material we have covered in this course has been extremely helpful and beneficial to attaining my goals. Not only are we provided with strong and relevant resources pertaining to these topics, but we are also given a chance to practice some of these elements as well. Being able to actually practice what we are reading about is a huge bonus to me! At this point, I do not see any reason to modify my goals. I have been very happy with them and happy that this class has provided so many resources related to them.

Carol Dweck defines two types of mindsets: the fixed mindset and the growth mindset. The characteristics of these two types of mindsets makes it very clear to me that in order to achieve my learning goals for this course, and towards information fluency skills in general, I must have a growth mindset. A lot of things in this course are new to me, such as blogging, the use of Twitter, and the overall concepts of information fluency and inquiry learning. Dweck says, "Students with a growth mindset, on the other hand, view challenging work as an opportunity to learn and grow." This course is providing me an opportunity to learn and grow in areas that are new and a little uncomfortable to me. I have to be able to say, "I love a challenge". I think this thought process can also be used towards having a growth mindset towards information fluency skills. You must be positive and not afraid to tackle new ideas and concepts. Dweck also states to "emphasize the challenge". "Meaningful learning tasks need to challenge every student in some way. It is crucial that no student be able to coast to success time after time; this experience can create the fixed-mindset belief that you are smart only if you can succeed without effort." While this quote is about students, I think the same can be said for learners of any age and ability level. We must be okay with the challenge of information fluency. It's okay if it pushes us to be better, because that is they only way we will actually grow.

Our attitudes towards information fluency must be like race car driver example Dweck gives in her mindset interview... "races last a long time and throughout the course of the event mistakes are inevitable. The difference between a winning driver and a losing driver is what you do with those mistakes." We must have a growth mindset towards information fluency. We must be ready for the challenge and understand we probably will make mistakes along the way, however, those mistakes will not hinder or stop us from working hard and completing our goals and intentions!

Dweck, C. (2010, September). Even Geniuses Work Hard. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept10/vol68/num01/Even-Geniuses-Work-Hard.aspx

Bell, M. (Director). (2010, December 11). Carol Dweck: Mindset interview [Video file]. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICILzbB1Obg 
Dweck, C. (2010, September). Even Geniuses Work Hard. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept10/vol68/num01/Even-Geniuses-Work-Hard.aspx
Dweck, C. (2010, September). Even Geniuses Work Hard. Retrieved June 2, 2017, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept10/vol68/num01/Even-Geniuses-Work-Hard.aspx